![]() |
|
An Overview of the Regulatory Landscape Can you explain the regulatory landscape regarding business continuity management?
Since 2001, nearly every BCM regulatory requirement or standard has
been enhanced or expanded to address increases in the threat
environment, as well as a focus on corporate governance. The following
chart outlines the more common regulations and standards, along with
specific requirements associated with each.
What is NFPA 1600? NFPA is the National Fire Protection Association, a standards making body headquartered in Massachusetts. Their most popular work is NFPA 101, the Life Safety Code that governs most life safety issues in commercial buildings across the country. It is common for local and state governments to adopt NFPA standards verbatim into their building and life safety codes. NFPA 1600 is the standard on Disaster Management and Business Continuity. Work on the standard began in the 1990's, and the first version was published in 2000. An updated version was published in 2004. Unlike many standards and regulatory requirements, NFPA is industry neutral, and even applies to the public sector's ability to prepare for, respond to and recover from disasters (commonly known as Continuity of Operations Planning, or COOP). This standard is only three pages long, and includes elements of prevention, preparedness, response and recovery. NFPA is not nearly as far reaching as other standards in the industry, and is a reasonable first step for organizations without an up to date business continuity management program. Many industries, such as financial services and healthcare, have requirements that go far beyond NFPA 1600. The standard became especially significant after the Federal 9/11 Commission recommended it as the National Preparedness Standard, encouraging everyone from insurance companies to credit rating agencies to include it in their evaluations of their customers. Since that time, Congressional leaders have introduced it into pending Homeland Security legislation (HR 4830) to direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop and implement a program to enhance private sector preparedness for emergencies and disasters preparedness. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) initiative is also known as “Ready Business,” and includes its own endorsement of NFPA 1600. There is a BCP requirement published by the SEC regarding New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) members. Are all NYSE listed companies required to follow these BCP guidelines? The NYSE Rule 446 requires member companies to maintain and test business continuity plans/strategies – namely those who are members of the exchange. Member firms are the organizations trading securities, not those being traded. The National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) published almost identical requirements for their membership. The SEC approved both the NYSE and NASD rules. The NYSE/NASD requirement mandates a flexible plan that includes:
Does HIPAA include a requirement to do business continuity management? Several aspects of business continuity management are included in the security section of the HIPAA requirements. Specifically, HIPAA (Section 164.308) requires:
Additionally, section 164.310 requires contingency plans for facility access and security. Section 164.312 requires procedures to gain access to protected health information during an emergency. The contingency plan requirements were a major focus area during the public comment period. The Department of Health and Human Services did not agree that the requirement was overly burdensome or costly and emphasized that this requirement must be met on time (for most organizations, April 2005). These HIPAA requirements generally expand on most healthcare organizations’ BCM requirements that are mandated by under JCAHO. A common misconception is that the HIPAA requirements are exclusively focused on information technology. Although most of HIPAA is IT focused, Protected Health Information (PHI) is found in many forms, and the Emergency Mode Operation plan is not an IT issue at all. Rather, this requirement addresses how the provider will continue to protect PHI if normal IT controls are gone, which could be considered the most difficult provision in the regulation. Does the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) require business continuity management for hospitals? EC.1.4 clearly states the healthcare organization (provider) must develop an emergency management plan that addresses mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery. The requirement includes a hazard vulnerability analysis (risk assessment), development and training of teams with a variety or roles, plan escalation protocols, business resumption procedures and annual maintenance and testing. Business continuity management is especially important for healthcare organization because they could be in a situation where their normal operations are compromised concurrently with an increase in the community’s demand for their services. Why is the FFIEC regulation called “the BCP Gold Standard?” The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) standard is the most aggressive standard in the US marketplace. The FFIEC has greater governance, risk assessment, business impact analysis, planning, testing and maintenance requirements than any other standard. It contains an entire section on senior management’s business continuity responsibility, which is a helpful reference for any company in any industry. The standard is also an excellent example of the increasing expectations surrounding business continuity management. The standard was significantly expanded from the 1996 version in 2003. Although still listed in the category of IT Examination, the standard itself states, “BCP is more than recovery of the technology, but rather a recovery of all critical business operations.” The FFIEC’s own summary is an excellent resource for developing the scope of a business continuity program:
What is COBIT? Is it focused solely on information technology disaster recovery planning? Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies (COBIT) has been developed as a generally applicable and accepted standard for good Information Technology (IT) security and control practices that provides a reference framework for management, users, and IS audit, control and security practitioners. COBIT, issued by the IT Governance Institute and now in its third edition, provides tools to assess and measure the enterprise’s IT capability for the 34 COBIT IT processes. COBIT’s importance has increased as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 given its framework it useful for internal controls documentation and assessment. Although the COBIT definition implies a sole focus on Information Technology, the standard is written in such a way as to apply to crisis management, business resumption planning and information technology disaster recovery. Because of the relationship between Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 and COBIT, more practitioners are exposed to this standard than ever before (although business continuity management is specifically excluded from Section 404 compliance). Are these the only BCM mandates one needs to consider? There are many more BCM requirements that apply to most companies. OSHA regulations place some crisis management requirements on most US employers. Customer mandates, such as ISO/TS 16949 in the automotive industry require contingency planning. The Federal Reserve Board, Office of the Comptroller of Currency and the SEC worked together to design and publish the Interagency White Paper on Sound Practices to Strengthen the Resilience of the U.S. Financial System, which outlines additional expectations for business continuity management in the context of a regional event. The GAO issued a 111-page report on how the private sector needs to prepare for potential terrorist attacks. Clearly, the expectations on both public and private sector organizations for improved preparedness are higher than it has ever been. Some of the additional government and industry requirements for business continuity and crisis management include:
About the Authors: Brian Zawada (brian.zawada@protiviti.com) is a director and Michael Keating (michael.keating@protiviti.com) is an associate director with Protiviti Inc., a global firm specializing in internal audit and business and technology risk consulting services. Brian is based on Cleveland and is responsible for Protiviti’s global business continuity practice, whereas Mike is based in Atlanta and leads the delivery of business continuity services in the eastern half of the U.S.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||