|
By Oliver Schmidt
Crises for a company can take many forms. But whether they
are accidental, financial, legal, or otherwise, there is one thing that
all affected companies have in common: a critical need for a successful
managerial and operational response as well as effective communication
with both external and internal stakeholders.
Over the past two decades a growing number of companies
have developed and critically improved their customized approaches to
communicating with external stakeholders in the event of a crisis. However,
far too many companies still either do not realize or fail to act upon
the fact that effective employee communication is also crucial to managing
business crises.
Regardless of a company's size, reputation or industry,
preparing for effective employee communication in times of crisis inevitably
calls for putting the proper organizational structure and processes in
place before a crisis hits. This includes assigning responsibilities,
training employees and establishing instruments which enable seamless
vertical (top-down as well as bottom-up) and horizontal employee communication,
even in the face of extreme stress.
Only if the systematic planning, implementation and evaluation
of a company's internal crisis communication are conducted company-wide
and on an ongoing basis, will management be able to rely on this valuable
tool for minimizing crisis-related damage as well as seizing any opportunities
the crisis itself may present.
Following are practical tips for managers at all levels
of the corporate hierarchy to help ensure effective employee communication
during a crisis. Their implementation plays an important role in actively
preserving and even enhancing the company's reputation and competitiveness.
Recognizing employees as a key stakeholder
group with which to communicate
Corporate crises cause immense pressure and uncertainty for any affected
company and its employees. In order to prevent rumors, false information
and unfounded allegations all external as well as internal stakeholders
have to be communicated with. Companies that underestimate the importance
of effective employee communication during such a time often suffer significant
economic damage as the result of, among other reasons, a lack of trust,
low morale, and the subsequent loss of their most valuable asset, well-trained
and dedicated employees.
Therefore the following questions should be addressed when
a crisis occurs:
1. What is the desired outcome of the communication? [objective]
2. What will be communicated? [message]
3. Who will initiate the communication? [sender]
4. Which groups of employees (and management) will be communicated with?
[recipient]
5. How and / or where is the communication going to happen? [channel /
venue]
6. When will the communication take place? [timeline]
The following two questions must be addressed both during
the crisis and as part of the post-crisis evaluation and crisis preparedness
planning.
7. Was the communication objective met? [evaluation]
8. How can we do better? [optimizing]
Management also must understand (and prepare accordingly)
that in a crisis situation it is necessary to increase the internal communication
frequency since employees usually have a high demand for updated information
as well as the desire to provide continuous feedback.
Conducting open, timely and truthful
communication with your employees first
Especially in times of crisis only those employees who are being communicated
with in an open, timely and truthful way are both able and willing to
represent their company and actively support its goals inside and outside
the organization.
Management battling a crisis also has to be aware that whenever
possible internal communication should precede external communication.
It is of particular importance not to have external information sources
report negative crisis-related news previously unknown to the employees,
as it may alienate employees and hinder the successful crisis response
and recovery.
Engaging in an honest dialogue with as many employees as
possible also fosters better understanding and employee support in regard
to perhaps unpopular yet necessary steps management may need to take in
order to overcome the crisis and secure the company's future. Such was
the case when a major U.S. manufacturing company closed plants in several
states and Europe. The company won over affected employees by thoroughly
explaining why the closings were inevitable and providing comprehensive
information regarding alternative employment at other company locations,
outplacement services, and severance packages.
Responding to crisis-related employee
questions and concerns
Employees' questions and concerns should be anticipated, identified and
responded to in an appropriate manner. As the employees' trust in management's
ability to handle the crisis is vital, even those questions and concerns
that may be of minor importance to management or come at an inconvenient
time should be dealt with. This is especially true if employees or their
loved ones have suffered any type of physical or other harm due to the
company's wrongdoing.
In cases where the company may be responsible for any harm
to employees or their loved ones, it is usually beneficial to communicate
regret and empathy as well as an explanation of the steps the company
is taking to handle the situation.
This communication response, however, should not be based
upon the views of management alone, but must take into account the perceptions,
opinions and expectations within the different stakeholder groups. Of
course, management also has to bear in mind any restrictions (legal or
otherwise) on the dissemination of certain information relating to the
crisis.
Empowering employees to function
as communication allies
Employees have a vested interest in working with management to prevail
over the crisis and many are eager to actively promote the company's positions
internally as well as externally. Management should therefore guide employees
in their effort to speak up for the company. Empowering employees to take
charge in times of crisis creates valuable communication allies who not
only reinforce core messages internally, but also carry them into the
community.
The internal crisis communication should be conducted using
established communication channels and venues in addition to those that
may have been developed to manage specific crisis scenarios. Whichever
method of internal crisis communication a company may choose, the more
upfront management is about what is happening, the better informed and
more entrusted employees feel.
In order to enable effective internal crisis communication
between senior management and large numbers of employees, who may be located
in different countries, today's leading corporations employ sophisticated
communication channels, including customized Intranets, advanced Video
Conferencing Technology and professionally produced Business TV. However,
studies have repeatedly shown that face-to-face communication between
supervisors and their direct subordinates remains a decisive tool in facilitating
effective employee communication during a crisis and should thus not be
ignored.
Ensuring message consistency and
simultaneous communication
Effective external and internal crisis communication also depends upon
the consistency of messages conveyed by the company and its employees.
With the goal of coherent messages and simultaneous communication in mind,
more and more companies implement a 'One-Voice-Policy' that only permits
qualified employees who are electronically linked with senior management
and with one another to function as company spokespersons.
Provided the company employs a functioning 'Message Development
Process', the existence of a 'One-Voice-Policy' can be very beneficial
in a crisis situation. A lot of companies are however having a difficult
time making certain their 'One-Voice-Policy' is followed. One challenge
to the 'One-Voice-Policy' is the natural tendency of employees to talk
about stressful, work-related events with family and friends, perhaps
expressing criticism of management's handling of the situation.
However, a much greater risk to the 'One-Voice-Policy' is
the possibility that an employee, perhaps frustrated by a lack of information
and rising concerns over job security, might voice a complaint to the
news media. This move would not only sabotage the company's 'One-Voice-Policy',
but may in fact jeopardize the entire crisis response. Hence management
must remain sensitive to employees' needs and remember that there are
investigative journalists who gladly interview disgruntled employees in
order to produce a more sellable story.
Enabling employee feedback through
two-way communication
Successful management of a crisis depends on communication as a means
of (incident) notification as well as two-way crisis communication aimed
at seeking feedback and engaging in a constructive dialogue.
In times of crisis employees appreciate and increasingly
demand feedback options such as face-to-face communication and Intranet-based
two-way communication. Providing feedback options is worth little, however,
if the feedback is not taken seriously by management and incorporated
into the decision-making.
The following three arguments convinced senior managers
of a leading pharmaceutical corporation that engaging in an active dialogue
with as many employees as possible during a crisis is worthwhile even
though it may utilize scarce resources. As a result, the company's crisis
management plan now includes detailed information as to how employee feedback
will be generated should a crisis occur:
- First, employee feedback allows management to track whether messages
have reached the intended groups of employees and resulted in the desired
behavior.
- Second, employee feedback enables management to not only track employees'
opinions, perceptions, and expectations, but also reveals what messages
external stakeholders communicate to employees concerning the crisis.
- Third, and most importantly, employee feedback in times of crisis
often contains valuable information and important suggestions for minimizing
damage, seizing opportunities and preventing future crises.
Providing vital resources for maximizing
crisis preparedness
Ideally all company locations, levels of corporate hierarchy, business
divisions and departments are involved in the systematic planning, implementation
and evaluation of the company's crisis management. In this context complex
tasks including the integration of external and internal crisis communication
into the overall crisis management process and the implementation of a
company-wide issues management system have to be performed. These and
other essential crisis management-related assignments require resources
of which a relatively small yet critically important portion should be
dedicated to ensuring effective employee communication.
Because corporate crises are part of the organizational
life cycle, they can sooner or later happen to any company no matter how
much emphasis management places on indispensable crisis prevention. Hence
the key to organizational survival lies in maximizing the company's crisis
preparedness. If management does not possess sufficient theoretical knowledge
and crisis communication experience, it is advisable to recruit external
consultants, whose involvement helps to increase the company's crisis
readiness as well as its ability to effectively respond to a crisis and
recover from it quickly.
Only if management acknowledges the critical importance
of maximizing crisis preparedness and actively promotes the corresponding
mindset throughout the company, will it be possible to minimize crisis-induced
damage and convert resulting organizational change into competitive advantages.
As many corporations, unfortunately, have had to learn the hard way, effective
employee communication plays an essential role in the successful management
of crises and facilitates the necessary organizational change.
About the Author
Oliver S. Schmidt is the Managing Partner of C4CS™,
a leading consulting firm based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, which
specializes in strategic communication and crisis management.
A multilingual native of Berlin, Germany, Schmidt
has lived and worked in North America, Europe, and Asia. He regularly
advises senior managers concerning high stakes communication issues, provides
executive coaching and management training, and makes presentations to
audiences around the world.
Mr. Schmidt combines extensive international work
experience with a solid academic education, holding a Master's degree
in Communication Science and Business Management. He has been a guest
lecturer at universities in several European countries and in the USA.
He can be reached at: schmidt@c4cs.com
and his company website is: www.c4cs.com
|